Facilitating Better Negotiation Solutions using AniMed
نویسندگان
چکیده
Mediation is an important paradigm for dispute resolution. If done properly, it can lead to“win-win” situations and benefit all parties. Thus, the advantage of designing a proficient automated mediator capable of interacting with people during their negotiations is of great importance. Yet, succeeding in this task is difficult due to the diversity of people and their bounded rationality. To be successful, the mediator must take this into account, and propose solutions deemed relevant, or otherwise, lose the focus and trust of the negotiators. In this paper we present AniMed. AniMed is an automated animated mediator, incorporated with a novel proposal generation strategy, aimed to increase the social benefit of the negotiating parties. To validate the benefits of using AniMed in negotiations, experiments were conducted with more than 100 people negotiating with each other. The results demonstrate the significant increase both in the social welfare and the individual utilities of both parties, compared to negotiations in which another state-of-the-art automated mediator or no mediator was involved.
منابع مشابه
AniMed*: An Automated Animated Mediator for Facilitating Negotiation with People
Mediation is an important paradigm for dispute resolution which dates back to Ancient Greece. The goal is to reach an agreement, i.e. a mutually accepted solution, without resorting to a struggle. Yet, when people negotiate they demonstrate bounded rationality in their actions and diversity in their behaviors. This increases the difficulty to design automated mediators. To be successful, the me...
متن کاملBridging the Gap: Face-to-Face Negotiations with Automated Mediator
Mediation is an important paradigm for dispute resolution. It can lead to “win-win” situations and benefit all parties. Yet, when people negotiate they demonstrate bounded rationality in their actions and diversity in their behaviors. This increases the difficulty to design automated mediators. To be successful, the mediator must take this into account and propose solutions deemed relevant, oth...
متن کاملGetting to best: efficiency versus optimality in negotiation
Negotiation between two individuals is a common task that typically involves two goals: maximize individual outcomes and obtain an agreement. However, research on the simplest negotiation tasks demonstrates that although naive subjects can be induced to improve their performance, they are often no more likely to achieve fully optimal solutions. The present study tested the prediction that a dec...
متن کاملSeparation of Carboxylic Acids from Aqueous Solutions using Hollow Fiber Membrane Contactors
Separation of formic, acetic, and propionic acids from the aqueous stream using membrane solvent extraction has been studied using three different membrane contactors made of polysulfone (PS), polyethersulfone (PES), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) using two different solvents; including ethyl acetate (EA) and diisopropyl ether (DIPE). The efciency of the membrane and e...
متن کامل1. The WinWin Approach: Using a Requirements Negotiation Tool for Rationale Capture and Use
A highly cost-effective approach for rationale capture and management is to provide automated support, and capture the resulting artifacts of the process by which software and system requirements and solutions are negotiated. The WinWin process model, equilibrium model, and collaborative negotiation tool provide capabilities for capturing the artifacts. The MBASE software process model provides...
متن کامل